>> Read the full position paper in pdf
On 6 July 2025, the Ministerial Committee for Legislation approved a private member‘s bill submitted by Likud MK Avichay Boaron aimed at seriously infringing on the independence of legal counsels in government ministries and transform them from gatekeepers into the yes-men of ministers.
The role of these legal counsels is crucially important, as they are tasked with ensuring the legality of state actions and protecting the public interest. As part of the regime revolution and efforts to steer the country in the direction of an authoritarian model devoid of checks and balances, the government has in recent years taken steps aimed at undermining their independence.
Contrary to its title, the proposed Bill on Independence of Legal Counsels in Government Ministries: Status and Powers-2025 aims to weaken and subordinate them to the political echelon. The bill poses the following dangers:
• Politicization of the job due to subordination to the ministry’s director general. According to the bill, a ministry‘s legal counsel will no longer be subordinate to the Attorney General but rather to the ministry’s director general. This means that legal counsels will be subordinate to a political figure, and indirectly, to the minister, thereby undermining their ability to serve as gatekeepers preventing illegal policies and decisions.
• The minister may promote primary or secondary legislation contrary to a legal counsel’s position. The bill requires legal counsels to publish draft legislation if instructed by the minister, thus emasculating their key power to ensure that ministry legislation complies with legal requirements and constrictions.
• The State Attorney’s Office will be compelled to represent the legal counsel’s position in court. The bill obligates “state representatives in legal proceedings” (that is, the SAO) to present the legal counsel’s position as that of the ministry. Since the legal counsel will no longer be a professional and independent figure but will be dependent on the political echelon, the SAO will be forced to represent potentially political and unlawful positions.
• Weakening the legal counseling system. In case of a disagreement between legal counsels regarding the publication of draft legislation, the decision will fall to the government, which is a political body lacking the necessary competence to resolve professional-legal disputes.
In contrast, Zulat proposes a comprehensive amendment to the Government Law aimed at preserving the independence of legal counsels and preventing the politicization of this vital role. According to Zulat’s proposal, the opinion of legal counsels will remain binding, they will be appointed through a tender process, and limitations will be set on unregulated external consultation and on the termination of their tenure.
Ensuring the independence of the legal counsels of government ministries calls for categorically rejecting MK Boaron’s bill. Adopting Zulat’s alternative proposal will ensure the preservation of the rule of law and good governance, democratic principles, and the most basic civil rights.