>> Read the full Position Paper in PDF
Chapter B of the Bill for Broadcast Media Law-2025 deals with the creation of the Broadcast Media Authority (BMA) and attendant Audiovisual Content Regulation Council (ACRC). Zulat’s position is that the arrangements set out in the bill will bestow influence on actors associated with the governing echelon in a way that will harm the independence of these two new bodies.
According to the explanatory notes attached to the bill, the new body is intended to be “independent” and possess “professional capabilities.” However, not only does it fail to sever actors with ties to the governing echelon from the BMA, but it accords them substantial influence over the selection of the ACRC’s members and over its activities, and vests them with extensive and substantive powers in the regulation of broadcast media in Israel – first and foremost, far-reaching powers to revoke the registration of content providers and to impose significant monetary sanctions.
Among other things, the search committee that will select the ACRC’s members will be primarily consist of government officials. Moreover, the director general of the Communications Ministry (who, as is well known, is Minister Shlomo Karhi’s appointee in a position of trust) will serve as its chair and will be in control of the candidates presented for selection as ACRC members. Ultimately, at least five of the ACRC’s seven members – the four public representatives chosen by the search committee, and the three employees on behalf of the Communications Ministry, the Regulatory Authority, and the Competition Authority – will be selected or appointed with the substantial involvement of the governing echelon.
By way of comparison, under the model established in the Public Broadcasting Law, all members of the Israel Public Broadcasting Corporation Council are selected by an independent and autonomous search committee. The Communications Minister appoints a retired judge as its chair, and that is the extent of the minister’s role. The chairman appoints two additional members, and once they are appointed, the search committee is free to select all the other members.
The inevitable conclusion is that the bill does not seek to establish an independent authority, but rather one facilitating political influence. In Zulat’s view, the format proposed in the bill should not be implemented and should be replaced with a model that ensures its independence and autonomy, similar to the one set in the Public Broadcasting Law.