>> Read the full position paper
This position paper was written in collaboration with the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI) in response to a bill seeking to impair the independence of the Israel Police’s Internal Investigations Department (known by its Hebrew acronym Mahash). It was submitted to a joint panel of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law, and Justice Committee and the National Security Committee ahead of a discussion held on 19 May 2025.
Bill on Amendment of Police Ordinance-2022 (Internal Investigations Department), a private bill approved in preliminary reading, is an integral part of the regime revolution pursued by the government since January 2023. Today Mahash operates under the State Attorney’s Office (SAO) and is professionally and organizationally subordinate to it, but the bill proposes to detach it from the SAO, to subordinate it directly to the Minister of Justice, and to empower it to investigate prosecutors.
There is absolutely no room for such a bill in a democratic state predicated on the rule of law and separation of powers for the following reasons:
- Subordinating Mahash to the Minister of Justice severely violates the rule of law: The bill tears down the vital buffer between political considerations and criminal proceedings and would allow the political echelon to interfere in investigations and prosecutions. Specifically, the appointment of the head of Mahash by Justice Minister Yariv Levin (instead of the professional selection process prescribed by the law today) would allow the latter to control the former as well as Mahash employees seeking promotion, as occurred with the Israel Police following the law amendment that subordinated it to the Minister of National Security.
- The bill is based on an unsubstantiated claim, devoid of any factual foundation, about a “back-scratching” relationship between the SAO and the Israel Police: Though one might theoretically argue that a potential conflict of interest exists in certain situations, in practice, in over 30 years since Mahash’s establishment, not a single case is known where this concern materialized. Moreover, State Comptroller reports examining Mahash’s performance over the years identified a totally opposite problem, expressing concern that Mahash lacked full professional independence from the Israel Police rather than from the SAO.
- Mahash’s politicization would deal a lethal blow to freedom of protest and expression: Data show that Mahash is already too lenient toward the Israel Police, especially in cases of violations committed against citizens exercising their right to freedom of protest (less than 1% of the cases of violence at demonstrations result in indictments). Under the direct political control of the Minister of Justice, the likelihood of an effective investigation into violence against anti-government demonstrators would be nonexistent.
- Empowering a Minister of Justice-controlled Mahash to investigate prosecutors is a dangerous tool: It would allow the government to exert improper pressure on prosecutors handling corruption cases involving public officials and to use bogus investigations to delay or thwart criminal proceedings against members of the government.
Zulat and PCATI categorically oppose the proposed bill, which is not based on any factual or professional foundation but is meant to enable the Minister of Justice to wield dangerous control over Mahash and the investigation of prosecutors.