>> Click here to read the full Position Paper
This document was written by Zulat in response to the Israel Public Broadcasting Bill-2023 (Amendment: Annual Report to the Knesset Economics Committee) (“the bill”). We would like to note from the outset that, in our opinion, the bill seeks to undermine the independence of the Israel Public Broadcasting Corporation (IPBC) and to enable political influence over its operations, contrary to the stated goals of the Israel Public Broadcasting LawA-2014, by virtue of which the IPBC was established (“the IPBC Law”).
Among other things, the IPBC Law was intended to ensure the independence of the IPBC’s broadcasts and free it of political interference and interests, as well as to set oversight and transparency mechanisms over its activities and budgetary conduct. It requires the IPBC to submit annual activity and financial reports to the Minister of Communications, who may examine them, and if necessary, order the IPBC to submit additional reports and forward the financial reports for a professional audit by the Government Companies Authority (GCA).
Therefore, the bill does nothing to increase the transparency of the IPBC’s operations, given that its annual reports are transparent as it is, are submitted to the minister, are unclassified, and may be accessed by Knesset members and the general public on the IPBC’s website. The bill seeks to add another layer of oversight by the Knesset Economics Committee, thereby allowing for political influence on the IPBC and undermining its independence. The proposed additional supervisory layer would impair the oversight and transparency mechanisms set forth in the law and would run counter to the essence of the law and the purposes for which the IPBC was established, such as ensuring independent broadcasts, freedom of expression, and unbiased reportage, which are vital to the very existence of a democratic regime.
A review of the arrangements applicable to other public corporations scrutinized by the Knesset Economics Committee shows that they do not include such a political mechanism. Therefore, this raises cause for concern that it was uniquely tailored for the IPBC to enable politicians to exert improper influence on the IPBC’s broadcasts, thereby violating the basic principles of the State of Israel, including freedom of the press.