>> Read the full position paper
In recent years, the government has pursued a systematic effort to concentrate political power in the country’s institutions in charge of law enforcement. In the case of the Israel Police, political interference in their work has proceeded at an accelerated pace, undermining their professional independence and eroding the rule of law. This objective is not a theoretical one, and it is particularly evident in the way the police respond to civic protest and use force against demonstrators.
The bill proposing to subordinate Mahash (Israel Police’s Internal Investigations Department) to the political echelon is the next phase in this process. Having completed the takeover of the police from below, the bill now seeks to finalize the process from above by severing Mahash from the State Attorney’s Office (SAO) and shifting its powers to a body that would in practice be controlled by the Minister of Justice, thereby creating a pincer movement: a police force exposed to direct political pressure on the one hand, and the dismantling of the checks, independence, and oversight mechanisms meant to restrain the use of force on the other.
Despite its shortcomings and its often overly lenient approach toward police officers, Mahash remains one of the last mechanisms protecting the public from abuse of authority and overpolicing. Instead of correcting the deficiencies of a complex body in need of reform, the current bill seeks to dismantle it from within: a political appointee as its head, control of its budget, and separation from the SAO’s professional backbone. The significance is clear: the investigation of police violence will be subject to the government’s political considerations.
The consequences for the freedom of protest are severe and immediate. When police officers know that oversight mechanisms are weakening and that enforcement against them is subject to political control, practical restraints on the use of force are effectively removed. Hurting detainees and demonstrators, and the message conveyed to the public that protest may end in violent arrest without any accountability, undermine the foundations of democracy and pose a direct threat to the right to protest, freedom of expression, and public trust in the state.