>> Read the full position paper
The Justice Minister’s policy of boycotting the President of the Supreme Court represents a profound assault on the rule of law in Israel. When a cabinet minister refuses to recognize or cooperate with the country’s Chief Justice, he is effectively paralyzing statutory mechanisms that require joint action by the executive and judicial branches. This constitutes a violation of the principle of separation of powers and sets a dangerous precedent whereby the executive branch chooses which laws it will obey and which it will disregard.
This policy has direct consequences for the daily lives of citizens: delays in essential appointments, paralysis of the parole board system, shortages of judges and registrars, and severe backlogs throughout the courts. The result is justice withheld, infringement of the right to a fair trial, harm to prisoners’ rehabilitation, and disruption of essential public services that hinge on the proper functioning of the judicial system. The damage is not theoretical, but is already occurring in practice and is eroding public confidence in the judiciary.
Zulat’s petition to the Supreme Court seeks to end this institutional paralysis by compelling the Justice Minister to exercise his statutory powers in accordance with the law and the principles of good governance. The minister’s powers are not a matter of unfettered political discretion, but rather public duties intended to ensure the proper functioning of the judicial system and to safeguard the rights of those who depend on it. The rule of law requires the executive branch to act within the legal framework and not to use governmental powers as instruments in a political struggle at the expense of the public’s rights and the proper functioning of the state.