On January 18, 2026, a session was held in the Knesset dealing with the structure of the search committee of the Broadcasting Authority. Adv. Ronen Reingold, representing Zulat, warned that the changes being promoted by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi constitute a deliberate attempt to politicize the regulator and create political control over the broadcasting market.
Adv. Reingold stated that one of the few models that has succeeded over the years in creating an effective buffer between politics and the regulator is the public broadcasting corporation model, based on a Selection Committee for the Board members, headed by a retired judge. Even if this model has weaknesses, Reingold emphasized, it is the most far-removed mechanism built in Israel to date, as evidenced by the communications minister’s many failed attempts to influence the corporation’s appointment proceedings.
In light of these failures, Karhi is now advancing a weakened regulatory model that deliberately restores the minister’s and his ministry’s control over the essence of the oversight mechanisms, in complete contradiction to the declaration that the bill’s purpose is to ‘distance politics from the world of content.’
Reingold emphasized that the broadcasting sector is a unique and sensitive field requiring particularly high institutional independence. He argued that placing the Director General of the Ministry of Communications – the minister’s personal appointment – at the head of the Selection Committee grants the minister de facto control over the agenda, work pace, and professional direction of the regulator, even if formally it represents ‘one voice out of five.’
Reingold also warned against misleading comparisons to other selection committees in the public service, noting that the relevant comparison is to the public broadcasting corporation model, in which a clear buffer was built, even if imperfect. Instead of strengthening this buffer, the current bill bypasses it and hollows out the principle of independence.
In the course of his remarks, Reingold clarified that the exceptional situation that arose, when the Communications Minister effectively paralysed the selection committee’s work, is a clear case of ‘hard cases make bad law’ – an attempt to address a one-off malfunction through a broad structural change, leading to the opposite outcome of weakening regulation and subordinating it to political considerations. Reingold proposed that instead, the public broadcasting corporation model should be returned to, with targeted strengthening of the working mechanisms, in a manner that would prevent the possibility of paralysing the selection committee without compromising the principle of independence.
Representatives of the Ministry of Justice announced in the committee that they accept the argument and expressed willingness to reconsider strengthening the corporation model as an alternative to the proposed model.
/