>> Click here to download the full position paper in PDF
The proposed law amendments known as the “Feldstein Law” seek to amend the existing legal framework regarding the disclosure of classified information and the protection of whistleblowers. Zulat’s position is that these proposals constitute a politicization of classified information and criminal proceedings and that these legislative changes must be prevented.
Key Legislative Proposals:
- Amendment of Law on Disclosure of Classified Information to the Prime Minister and Ministers: Seeks to allow the direct passing of classified information to the Prime Minister, certain ministers, and other senior officials.
- Amendment of Penal Code (Protection of Whistleblowers in Corruption and Security Contexts): Seeks to extend immunity to police officers and employees of security agencies such as the Shin Bet, Mossad, and the IDF.
These proposals promote the politicization of classified information and undermine the principle of nonpartisanship by allowing political leaders to access classified information without professional oversight. This could lead to misguided decisions and even the use of information for political purposes. Furthermore, the proposed amendments could impair the independence of security and legal institutions and enable the exploitation of classified information for personal and political interests. The proposed conditions for immunity are vague and insufficient, effectively serving as a “smokescreen” for granting blanket immunity to political figures.
As a result, professional oversight mechanisms could be damaged, potentially leading to leaks or decisions based on partial, distorted, or biased information. Additionally, the influence of political interests within the security establishment could grow, fostering internal competition among employees to provide information that aligns with the ruling political agenda.
Zulat strongly opposes these legislative proposals, as they would set dangerous precedents that weaken the rule of law and security institutions. The proposed amendments are seen as an attempt to institutionalize a situation where political leaders can directly interfere in criminal proceedings and the management of security information. Zulat calls for adherence to the principles of nonpartisanship and the prevention of these legislative changes, as they could destabilize democracy and jeopardize national security.